Which of the following is NOT typically an analysis tool for identifying root causes?

The choice of peer review as not typically being an analysis tool for identifying root causes is justified because peer review primarily serves as a quality assurance process. It involves colleagues examining each other's work to ensure accuracy and adherence to standards, rather than specifically analyzing data to uncover underlying issues or root causes of a problem.

On the other hand, analysis tools such as fish-bone diagrams, scatter plot diagrams, and check sheets are specifically designed to help dissect problems and determine their root causes. Fish-bone diagrams (also known as Ishikawa diagrams) visually map out potential factors contributing to a problem, helping teams identify various causes. Scatter plot diagrams are employed to identify relationships between variables, which can uncover patterns that point toward root causes. Check sheets provide a systematic way of collecting and analyzing data relevant to particular problems, which can be pivotal in root cause analysis.

Thus, peer review stands apart from traditional analytical tools focused on root cause identification, aligning it more with evaluation and oversight than with direct analysis of causes.